PASCAL VOC Challenge performance evaluation and download server |
|
Home | Leaderboard |
mean | aero plane | bicycle | bird | boat | bottle | bus | car | cat | chair | cow | dining table | dog | horse | motor bike | person | potted plant | sheep | sofa | train | tv/ monitor | submission date | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
O2P_SVRSEGM_CPMC_CSI [?] | 49.6 | 68.6 | 33.1 | 48.9 | 37.2 | 49.5 | 64.2 | 66.0 | 48.5 | 18.3 | 54.6 | 30.6 | 41.0 | 62.1 | 58.0 | 53.2 | 38.1 | 58.8 | 32.9 | 46.2 | 46.5 | 20-Nov-2012 | |
CVC_Harmony+Det [?] | 40.1 | 58.3 | 23.1 | 39.0 | 37.8 | 36.4 | 63.2 | 62.4 | 31.9 | 9.1 | 36.8 | 24.6 | 29.4 | 37.5 | 60.6 | 44.9 | 30.1 | 36.8 | 19.4 | 44.1 | 35.9 | 30-Aug-2010 | |
Svr-Segm [?] | 39.7 | 52.5 | 27.4 | 32.3 | 34.5 | 47.4 | 60.6 | 54.8 | 42.6 | 9.0 | 32.9 | 25.3 | 27.1 | 32.4 | 47.1 | 38.3 | 36.8 | 50.3 | 21.9 | 35.2 | 40.9 | 30-Aug-2010 | |
Bonn_FGT_Segm [?] | 36.5 | 54.6 | 22.5 | 25.1 | 27.6 | 40.0 | 60.2 | 48.3 | 39.4 | 7.3 | 30.8 | 21.3 | 25.3 | 34.9 | 54.1 | 36.6 | 22.5 | 45.0 | 17.6 | 33.5 | 37.0 | 30-Aug-2010 | |
CVC_Harmony [?] | 35.4 | 56.7 | 20.6 | 31.0 | 33.9 | 20.8 | 57.6 | 51.4 | 35.8 | 7.1 | 28.1 | 22.6 | 24.3 | 29.3 | 49.4 | 37.8 | 23.3 | 37.6 | 18.1 | 45.6 | 30.7 | 29-Aug-2010 | |
LSVM-MDPM [?] | 31.8 | 36.7 | 23.9 | 20.9 | 18.8 | 41.0 | 62.7 | 49.0 | 21.5 | 8.3 | 21.1 | 7.0 | 16.4 | 28.2 | 42.5 | 40.5 | 19.6 | 33.6 | 13.3 | 34.1 | 48.5 | 26-Aug-2010 | |
AHCRF [?] | 30.3 | 31.0 | 18.8 | 19.5 | 23.9 | 31.3 | 53.5 | 45.3 | 24.4 | 8.2 | 31.0 | 16.4 | 15.8 | 27.3 | 48.1 | 31.1 | 31.0 | 27.5 | 19.8 | 34.8 | 26.4 | 30-Aug-2010 | |
REGION-LABEL [?] | 29.1 | 38.8 | 21.5 | 13.6 | 9.2 | 31.1 | 51.9 | 44.4 | 25.7 | 6.7 | 26.0 | 12.5 | 12.8 | 31.0 | 41.9 | 44.4 | 5.7 | 37.5 | 10.0 | 33.2 | 32.3 | 30-Aug-2010 | |
UC3M_Generative_Discriminative [?] | 27.8 | 45.9 | 12.3 | 14.5 | 22.3 | 9.3 | 46.8 | 38.3 | 41.7 | - | 35.9 | 20.7 | 34.1 | 34.8 | 33.5 | 24.6 | 4.7 | 25.6 | 13.0 | 26.8 | 26.1 | 30-Aug-2010 |
Title | Method | Affiliation | Contributors | Description | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Associative hierarchical CRF | AHCRF | Oxford Brookes University | Lubor Ladicky Christopher Russell Philip Torr | Associative hierarchical CRF with detectors and cooccurence. One pixel layer with dense feature boost potential, 6 segmentation with potentials based on histograms of features, detector potential based on part-based model sliding window detector, generatively trained cooccurence potential | 2010-08-30 22:14:09 |
FG Detection, FG Tiling | Bonn_FGT_Segm | Univeristy of Bonn | João Carreira, Adrian Ion, Fuxin Li, Cristian Sminchisescu | - Detection on figure-ground segmentations; - Classification by detection; - Semantic segmentation on figure-ground tilings; | 2010-08-30 23:08:18 |
Harmony Potentials | CVC_Harmony | Computer Vision Center - Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona | Josep Maria Gonfaus, Xavier Boix, Fahad Kahn, Joost van de Weijer, Andrew Bagdanov, Marco Pedersoli, Jordi Gonzàlez, Joan Serrat | Our submission is based on [1]. We use the CVC_flat classification submission as the observations for the global node. New Absolute Position Prior is added to the Superpixels Probabilities [1] Josep M. Gonfaus, Xavier Boix, Joost Van de Weijer, Andrew D. Bagdanov, Joan Serrat, and Jordi Gonzàlez, " Harmony Potentials for Joint Classification and Segmentation ", in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), San Francisco, CA, 2010. | 2010-08-29 20:10:26 |
CVC_Harmony plus Detection Priors | CVC_Harmony+Det | Computer Vision Center - Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona | Josep Maria Gonfaus, Xavier Boix, Fahad Kahn, Joost van de Weijer, Andrew Bagdanov, Marco Pedersoli, Joan Serrat, Xavier Roca, Jordi Gonzàlez | Our submission is based on [1] and the previous submission "CVC_Harmony". Here we add the detection scores of [2] as location prior in the image. [1] J.M. Gonfaus, X. Boix, J. Van de Weijer, A. D. Bagdanov, J. Serrat, and J. Gonzàlez, "Harmony Potentials for Joint Classification and Segmentation", in CVPR 2010. [2] Felzenszwalb, Girshick, McAllester, Ramanan, "Object Detection with Discriminatively Trained Part Based Models", PAMI 2010 | 2010-08-30 23:52:37 |
LSVM Mixtures of deformable part models | LSVM-MDPM | University of Chicago and TTI-C | Pedro Felzenszwalb (UChicago), Ross Girshick (UChicago), David McAllester (TTI-C) | Our submission is based on an extension of [1,2]. Each model has 6 components with 8 parts. We associate a binary mask with each component to generate segmentations. The object detection models were trained from bounding boxes. The segmentation masks were trained from segmentations. [1] P. Felzenszwalb, R. Girshick, D. McAllester, D. Ramanan. Object Detection with Discriminatively Trained Part Based Models. PAMI 32(9), Sept 2010 [2] http://people.cs.uchicago.edu/~pff/latent-release4/ | 2010-08-26 04:07:34 |
O2P+SVRSEGM Regressor + Composite Statistical Inference | O2P_SVRSEGM_CPMC_CSI | (1) Georgia Institute of Technology (2) University of California - Berkeley (3) Amazon Inc. (4) Lund University | Fuxin Li | We utilize a novel probabilistic inference procedure, Composite Statisitcal Inference (CSI) [1], on semantic segmentation using predictions on overlapping figure-ground hypotheses. Regressor predictions on segment overlaps to the ground truth object are modelled as generated by the true overlap with the ground truth segment plus noise, parametrized on the unknown percentage of each superpixel that belongs to the unknown ground truth. A joint optimization on all the superpixels and all the categories is then performed in order to maximize the likelihood of the SVR predictions. The optimization has a tight convex relaxation so solutions can be expected to be close to the global optimum. A fast and optimal search algorithm is then applied to retrieve each object. CSI takes the intuition from the SVRSEGM inference algorithm that multiple predictions on similar segments can be combined to better consolidate the segment mask. But it fully develops the idea by constructing a probabilistic framework and performing maximum composite likelihood jointly on all segments and categories. Therefore it is able to consolidate better object boundaries and handle hard cases when objects interact closely and heavily occlude each other. For each image, we use 150 overlapping figure-ground hypotheses generated by the CPMC algorithm (Carreira and Sminchisescu, PAMI 2012), SVRSEGM results, and linear SVR predictions on them with the novel second order O2P features (Carreira, Caseiro, Batista, Sminchisescu, ECCV2012; see VOC12 entry BONN_CMBR_O2P_CPMC_LIN) as the input to the inference algorithm. [1] Fuxin Li, Joao Carreira, Guy Lebanon, Cristian Sminchisescu. Composite Statistical Inference for Semantic Segmentation. CVPR 2013. | 2012-11-20 18:39:06 |
Optimizing regions and their labels | REGION-LABEL | Stanford University | M. Pawan Kumar, Stephen Gould, Haithem Turki, Dan Preston, Daphne Koller | The method groups pixels into regions and assigns the regions a unique semantic label simultaneously by minimizing a global energy function. Features used include those obtained from an object detector (deformable parts-based model) as well as a bag of SIFT words computed over the region. Inference as described in CVPR 2010, learning as described in ICCV 2009. | 2010-08-30 18:13:43 |
Svr-Segm | Svr-Segm | University of Bonn | Joao Carreira, Fuxin Li, Adrian Ion, Cristian Sminchisescu | Support vector regression to multiple descriptors extracted on segmentations. Descriptors include SIFT, color SIFT and HOG on foreground and background. Post-processing to eliminate spurious detections and segmentations. The winning method of 2009 challenge. | 2010-08-30 22:52:55 |
Combination of Generative Discriminative Methods | UC3M_Generative_Discriminative | Universidad Carlos III de Madrid | Iván González-Díaz, Fernando Díaz de María | Combination of Supervised Topic Models with SVM-based discriminative methods for concurrent image recognition and segmentation | 2010-08-30 13:27:41 |